Thanks for linking to this. I read the original comment over at Fr Jake's 'blog, and now I've seen Fr Griffith's 'blog post, and also Fr Haller's, and all of the comments.
Of course, I generally agree, but I think that the issue goes deeper than liturgy (as important as that is). There are sincere people on both sides of almost every (theological and/or moral) issue, and so the idea that "inclusion" means that in practice it is necessary to exclude some of them is, to be honest, as laughable as it is sad. No wonder the Anglican Communion is in such a mess!
is Priest-in-Charge of St. Paul's Episcopal Church, Chester, Pennsylvania; Priest Associate of Episcopal Carmel of St. Teresa, Rising Sun, MD; Priest Associate of the Shrine of Our Lady of Walsingham.
1 comment:
Father,
Thanks for linking to this. I read the original comment over at Fr Jake's 'blog, and now I've seen Fr Griffith's 'blog post, and also Fr Haller's, and all of the comments.
Of course, I generally agree, but I think that the issue goes deeper than liturgy (as important as that is). There are sincere people on both sides of almost every (theological and/or moral) issue, and so the idea that "inclusion" means that in practice it is necessary to exclude some of them is, to be honest, as laughable as it is sad. No wonder the Anglican Communion is in such a mess!
Post a Comment